News Briefs
Politics
U.S.A.
Everyone Else
Health
Science
Business
Technology
Sports
Video Games
Entertainment
Future
Retractions
Humour
News Home
News Archive

 

 

 

 

 





 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


SCRAPE TV NEWS STAFF

Editor-in-Chief
Dave Dalkin
Business
William Ashford
Health
Lauren Hebert
U.S.A.
Mike Michaels
Everyone Else
Emil Uliya
Science
Anna Phillips
Sports
Alexi Orton
Videogames
Douglas Havermore
Politics
Edward Bastil
Entertainment
Samantha Dryden
Technology
Martin Philton


 

 


 

 

 

philp roth wikipedia

PHILIP ROTH NOT A CREDIBLE ENOUGH SOURCE FOR WIKIPEDIA ARTICLE ABOUT PHILIP ROTH

September 8 2012

New York, NY – Philip Roth may be one of the most regarded American novelists of the 20th century but even he is not a good enough source for Wikipedia to get his information right. Roth is in a battle with the website to have an entry, regarding his most famous work ‘The Human Stain’ altered to reflect the truth as he sees it. Unfortunately Wikipedia editors have rejected his request saying that the man who wrote the book is not a credible enough source for them to alter the entry. Roth has taken his complaint wide, complaining in the New Yorker about his troubles instead of just, you know, changing it because that’s the way Wikipedia works.

Share
Filed Under: Entertainment